06.03.09
Virtual boyfriends
Lisa Katayama has an incredible gift for finding the absurd and writing about it in a really compelling way (usually combining a straight delivery with a genuine respect and curiosity), both on her blog and in her articles for Wired and other pubs (such as the one I work for in my day job).
She recently talked to the WSJ about virtual boyfriends, which are apparently becoming popular in Japan. The article says:
Sites like “Web Kare” (“Web Boyfriend,” at Web-Kare.jp) let users choose animated characters that live on their computers and cellphones; when prompted, they’ll tell you how great you look.
I love that “they’ll tell you how great you look” is the one feature mentioned.
Here are two of Lisa’s dating-related articles for Wired:
- Japan’s pick-up school.
- Love hotels photo gallery. (We discussed this, in a very uninformed way, in the Bros Roundtable a few months ago.)
Ed. note: I wordsmithed this about four times after I originally posted it, but it’s still not that well-written.
03.07.09
ABC News does their own Bros Roundtable
On their front door today, Yahoo had an item about 30-somethings and dating. Of course I had to watch it. They stole the Bros Roundtable idea! Check it out.
03.02.09
Dating book redux
The San Francisco Chronicle ran a funny little piece summarizing the dating advice from a few semi-recent books: The Rules, He’s Just Not That Into You, and some other ones I had never heard of. It makes me wonder, though, if anyone ever found their mate by thinking of it as a “sale.” That just seems so creepy. Maybe I should say “anyone in contemporary society.”
The Chron also ran this cheery little item about loneliness being bad for your health. Maybe I can get Blue Cross to pay me for blogging by convincing them this whole 100 Emails 20 Dates thing is preventive care.
02.18.09
Diet and dating, a British ban on goodbye kisses | Dating in the News
More dating in the news:
- “Is it shallow to consider diet while dating?” (Helena Echlin’s awesome Table Manners column, Chow.com).This reminded me of my Valentine’s Day poll.
- “Bring back British romance!” (The School of Life blog). Apparently Virgin Rail is banning kissing at drop-off points near train stations. There seems to be so much symbolism in the company name and the fact they made the decision around Valentine’s Day. Take a cold shower and think of England?
01.31.09
Dating in the news | January 31, 2009
It’s that time of year again. Time for all the news organizations and websites to start pumping out stories about relationships in the run-up to Valentine’s Day. Here are some highlights that I’ve come across recently (some are old stories, but new discoveries):
- Online dating — Helping pathetic women get their hopes crushed more efficiently (The Onion)
- The man date (NY Times). Why guys keep a seat between them at the movies and more.
- Women are harder to read on the first date (UPI). The small sample size and the researcher’s description of flirty-but-not-interested women as “deceptive” makes me distrust the results a bit.
- The dating go round (Science News). Lots of fascinating nuggets here: Uncertainty feeds attraction in the initial stages of relationships. Couples seek out emotional bonds at the earliest stages of relationships. Also, there’s a big discrepancy between what people think they want and what they pursue (no surprise there).
- It’s the economy, girlfriend (NYTimes). About a blog called Dating a Banker Anonymous. Um, any guy who consoles his colleague when your dad has just had a heart attack is a d-bag.
The other thing that keeps popping up is the He’s Just Not That Into You movie, which I am kind of excited about.
01.18.09
Cougar Parties
I just came across this article on a cougar and prey younger man meet-and-greet in Danville, California. This is my favorite part (emphasis added):
More than 100 guests looking for liaisons, if not love, paid $10 each to mingle at the East Bay’s first “Single Cougars Party”
I sort of admire cougars. Brazenly going after what they want, damn society’s norms. I don’t agree with Rich Gosse’s comment that it’s more conventional to be gay in San Francisco than it is to be a cougar — wait, actually I kind of do.
Digression: San Francisco can be weird that way. In most places, people are most tolerant of the people most like them. For those people, tolerance and similarity are directly proportionate: the more different someone is, the more difficult it is to be tolerant of them. In San Francisco, sometimes it feels like that works to a certain degree, then the equation flips around and it becomes inversely proportionate. Cross-dressing wiccan astronaut? Good for you! Older woman with a younger man? Deplorable!
But reading Paul Lee’s quotes gave me pause: this guy wants to date cougars so that he doesn’t have to grow up or be responsible. (Maybe he should check this out.) Then I realized that if he only dates cougars, he’s taking himself out of my and my friend’s dating pools. Have at ‘em, Paul!
A sidenote: A friend of mine used to go “cougar hunting” when he’d go to Monterey for surf trips. I need to find out more about this.
01.14.09
Valentine’s trip: The Museum of Failed Relationships
Planning a trip to Singapore for Valentine’s Day? Be sure to stop by the Museum of Failed Relationships, a traveling exhibit of mementos of heartbreak. Apparently they gather more (anonymously donated) relics of love gone wrong in each city they visit. My favorite? The axe used to destroy an ex’s furniture AND some of the broken furniture.
Happy Valentine’s Day!
01.13.09
Deodorant makes men feel sexier (to themselves)
The Economist recently did a story about a British study that found that when men use deodorant, they feel more confident, and women (who couldn’t smell them) thought they were sexier. I find this amusing for two reasons:
- It still doesn’t explain why guys who do use deodorant are still stinky sometimes. (I guess it’s the act of putting it on that makes them feel confident, not how successfully it masks their sweaty armpit smell.)
- The article has the following endearingly square-yet-trying-to-be-hip subhed: “Born chicka wah, ker-ching chicka ching.” Is that the British version of “Bom chicka wah wah”?
And to answer your other question, yes, I do occasionally read the Economist. (Like maybe twice a year. That counts, right?)
Feel free to use this to encourage the men in your life to make more liberal use of the Mennen in the morning.
Hat tip to Mind Hacks, who also used a funny headline for their post.
03.01.08
Identity Theft in Online Dating
It’s hard coming up with a profile. If selling ourselves was easy for single people, we probably wouldn’t be as single. But really, plagiarism?
The Mind Hacks blog has a good post on personality plagiarism on online dating sites, inspired by a recent WSJ article in which one victim of this identity theft (a guy who teaches an Internet dating class) actually had his photo stolen.
These items inspired a new category for 100 Emails, 20 Dates: red flags. People, if someone clearly stole someone else’s headline or description, you don’t want to date them. There’s always an excuse to be lazy: I was busy, I’m not creative, etc. But someone who actually wants to meet someone will put in the effort to come up with something original, even if it’s boring, rather than using the lazy “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery” excuse.
02.08.08
Dating Is Dying, Apparently
At least on college campuses. This news story says that recent research shows that college students are hooking up, rather than dating. “I don’t know when the last time I went on a date was,” says one college guy.
My first reaction was, well, doy. People in college don’t date, unless they’re dating. You know, you have to eat, you want to see a movie, you can do it with either your friends or boyfriend/girlfriend. You might invite someone you’re interested in, but why bother, really, when you could see that person in class, at a party, or at the local hangout.
But what is a date? Is it really just, “I’m hungry, want to go get something to eat with me?” To me, a date implies intention. I want to spend time with this person, let’s do something together so that we can meet our primary goal of spending quality time together. Maybe that’s one reason why long-term relationships with a person you like so often fizzle: the intention, the desire to make spending time with that person feel special disappears, and all you’re left with is, “Hey, want me to pick up some King of Thai on my way home?”
V., a 30-year-old super-cute woman in my knitting group, was talking about her recent Match.com dates. “I’m really liking the meeting up for drinks dates,” she said. “And this might sound weird, but I haven’t paid for anything. The guy always pays.” That seems to speak to the intentionality of it, too. You’re making an investment (albeit only an $8 one), into the possibility that this will work out. And that’s all it really takes to make something feel special.
Related Stories:

