12.17.08

The Demise of Dating: Another knee-jerk anti-hook-up op-ed

Posted in dating tagged , , at 11:32 pm by N

I had an odd sense of deja vu when I read Charles M. Blow’s op-ed, “The Demise of Dating,” in the New York Times today. Oh that’s right, I made fun of a similar article a few months ago. Only Blow’s piece is about high school kids, not college kids.

These articles pop up every few months with the same poorly substantiated argument. People aren’t dating anymore; isn’t that horrible. Insert text equivalent of a condescending head shake.

Blow is too young, judging from his picture, to take on the knee-jerking fuddy-duddy mantle. I’m not defending hooking up as the sole way for two teenagers who are attracted to each other to get to know each other (and the tone, as well as the content, of his op-ed implies that he believes hooking up has completely supplanted dating). But as far as approaches go, it’s not all bad.

Let’s look at the facts he dredges out:

  • High school seniors are hooking up more and dating less.
  • They hook up with people they already know, not strangers.
  • They are having less premarital sex.

What’s wrong with that? Wouldn’t you rather have your 16-year-old daughter kissing a boy she’s been friends with for two years than getting into a car with some stranger whose last name you might not even know?

As the recent news stories celebrating the solving of Adam Walsh’s murder point out, the legacy of that case is awareness. Awareness, or a greater understanding of risk, has lead to fear, fear leads to us sheltering our kids. We never learned as a culture to keep our American values of trust, openness, and neighborliness while maintaining that necessary awareness. God knows, I don’t have the foggiest idea how to do it. Better to keep your kids safe. Don’t let them out of the house. Don’t talk to strangers.

So is it really any wonder that when these kids become high school seniors, they don’t know how to “just ask someone out and get to know them”? Yes, it is sad. But Blow misses the point. It’s not sad because dating is dead. It’s sad because they haven’t been taught how to get to know new people.

On top of that, the economy is in the toilet. The cost of higher education is exorbitant. Kids who don’t save in high school won’t be able to pay for books in college — or get out of debt before they’re 40. Do we really want those kids spending $22 — three hours’ work on minimum wage in San Francisco — on movie tickets to go on a date?

Is that how we teach fiscal responsibility so that, once they do find someone they want to date, then marry, then buy a home with, they buy a house they can actually afford? Or by encouraging them to spend their meager disposable income to court someone, are we just raising another generation of overleveraged homeowners who not only helped contribute to the recent collapse of much of our financial system, but many of whom are now homeless because they were told they could afford something they obviously couldn’t?

Lover’s Lane has been around for decades, and it won’t go away. People are going to hook up, whether it’s on a date or not. What has gone away is an environment that is conducive to dating. Don’t blame the kids.

12.15.08

The universe is conspiring against me

Posted in dating tagged at 8:20 pm by N

Sure, that headline might sound hyperbolic, but let’s look at the series of events:

  1. I ask a boy out.
  2. AT&T mysteriously reroutes my phone number to the restaurant next door.
  3. When people call, it rings 5 times, then something picks up, the caller hears static, and the phone goes dead.
  4. AT&T is “unable to repair it” for more than 48 hours.

I don’t think I’m being irrational in thinking that AT&T is actively trying to keep me single. It takes effort to reroute someone’s phone line to another address. Maybe they want to keep the maximum number of customers, and married or coupled people, we all know, often share a land line and, in many cases, DSL service and even cell plans, via the FamilyTalk dealy.

Admittedly, items one and two happened several days apart, but really, people. I know a conspiracy when I see one.

12.11.08

Next!

Posted in dating at 10:27 pm by N

I think I should get my therapist to be a guest blogger here, because my best posts lately have just been me retelling his stories.

In my last appointment, we got on the subject of boys. I told him that one of my major problems is that I just don’t know when guys are hitting on me. If I do sense it, I think I must be wrong because my intuition has been wrong later in relationships and it’s lead me astray, so why should I listen to it in the beginning.

“How’s that working for you?” he asked, wryly.

I held up my left hand. “No ring on this finger, what?!?!” I said.

I told him about J.: that we’d been flirting, we went out one night, we finally talked about it, I told him I liked him. “What did he say?” my therapist asked.

“He said he thought I was hot,” I said.

“That’s good.”

“He said that I have the right ingredients.”

“Good. What else?”

“He said he wasn’t convinced it would work out,” I said, feeling like that was the clincher.

“Well, who is? When does anyone know it’s going to work out?” he said. “Then what happened?”

“Then we kissed.”

“Good.”

“But I couldn’t tell if he liked me or if he just wanted to kiss me,” I said.

“Guys generally don’t kiss girls they don’t like,” my therapist said. Which made sense. I guess. I still wasn’t convinced.

I told him that J. and I hadn’t really talked since that night. (I neglected to tell him that I accidentally sent him a completely inscrutable text when I was bombed last Friday. It was probably meant to be a booty call, but I reread it the next day, when I remembered that I had sent it, and I still couldn’t quite figure it out.)

He asked what would be my ideal outcome. Basically, I want to be able to tell him that I want to give it a chance. “So ask him out,” he said. “Call him up. Say you want to make out with him, askĀ  him out on a date, whatever. Ask him out. But don’t have any expectations. This is about you putting it out there. Once you do, it’s not about you anymore, it’s about him.”

He told me about a time when he was out with a friend whose husband had recently left her. She was really upset. Another friend of theirs, who “really sees things clearly,” was writing something down on a piece of paper as she was talking about it. During a pause in the conversation, the friend said, “Hey, I made a sign for you.” He flipped it around and it said, “NEXT!”

So that’s the idea I’m trying to cultivate. I ask for what I want, if the guy wants to respond, great. If not, on to the next one. Oddly enough, when I think of it that way, I see more possibilities. I’ve been thinking too much about scarcity of available guys. But when I think, “NEXT!” then I suddenly find more possibilities.

So I asked J. out on Monday. I left a message on his cell. He sent me a text a couple hours later saying he was out with friends. I texted him the next day: “Beers, shuffleboard, Doc’s Clock. Pick a time: tonight, Sunday, or next week.”

No response.

NEXT!

C.S. Lewis: Let Your Heart Be Broken

Posted in dating at 9:15 am by N

My current day job (as of 12/1) is at a brand-new experiential travel magazine. Someone sent this in as a response to our direct mail package, but it perfectly captures some thoughts and feelings I’ve had recently:

“There is no safe investment. To love at all is to be vulnerable. Love anything and your heart will certainly be wrung and possibly be broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact, you must give your heart to no one… Wrap it carefully around with hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements; lock it up safe in the casket or coffin of your selfishness. But in that casket–safe, dark, motionless, airless–it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, irredeemable. The only place outside heaven where you can be perfectly safe from all the dangers and perturbations of love is hell.” — C.S. Lewis

12.08.08

What Holiday Activity Is the Most Fun with a Partner? | 100E, 20D Poll

Posted in poll at 9:37 pm by N

As I finished decorating my tree (by myself), I thought about one of the first almost first dates I’ve had, when D.D. came over for dinner with my roommates and we all decorated our tree. (After he left, my roommates said that, yes, he did like me, and then, well, things lead to things).

What holiday activity makes you feel glad you have a partner or, if you’re single, wish you had one? If I’ve missed something, fill it out in the “Other” category.

12.02.08

What Is Love?

Posted in dating at 8:00 pm by N

Sesame Street was the best.

Most Helpful Dating Books

Posted in dating at 7:00 am by N

BadOnlineDates recently posted something on the best dating books. I’ve been thinking of writing a similar post for a while now. First off, let me say that I think most self-help books are B.S. Many of them are 400-page versions of a Cosmo article: something that is allegedly empowering but is actually kind of insulting to your intelligence. I think one of the best things that people can learn — in dating or whatever — is to trust their own instincts and listen to themselves. And my picks for good dating books encourage that.

1. He’s Just Not That Into You. The good thing about women is that we talk to our women friends about our lives. More often than not, our friends help bring a healthy dose of reality or perspective to a situation. But one area in which we often fail our female friends is in relationship advice. We give each other false hope (“Oh, maybe he’s just busy, that’s why he hasn’t called!”). I love this book because it reinforces the idea that if a guy’s not putting forth a modicum of effort, then he’s not into you. And that’s perfectly OK. Why waste time, energy, and emotion on a guy who’s never going to call/commit to you/end his marriage? This book was a much-needed wake-up call for me and my two roommates at the time.

2. Mars and Venus on a Date. Total self-help cheese (and written in extremely simplistic language), but there’s a lot of good advice in here. Men and women are different. We have different basic needs, we respond to situations differently, and we can be better partners to each other if we understand that. In this book, John Gray shows how to apply the Mars/Venus principles to dating — when you don’t actually know the person yet. One of my favorite pieces of advice in here is to take a step back and think about how you’re really feeling. I often get caught up in the excitement of a new relationship and don’t really realize whether it’s working (or how to make it work better) until the patterns start to be established.

3. The Rules. My friend P. bought me this book because it describes, to a degree, her philosophy on dating: be fun and aloof and when he’s ready, he’ll come around. If he’s not, you didn’t get that emotionally involved anyway. I have to include the same disclaimers that Liz Funk did on BadOnlineDates.com. This book is insultingly written and contains a lot of contradictory advice. For example, it says that it doesn’t matter what you look like, you can find the right person for you. But, if you have an unattractive nose, for example, the authors wholeheartedly recommend getting plastic surgery. Gross. But the fundamental idea is a good one: Live your life the way you want. Don’t give up your life for a guy. If the guy is distant, be present but don’t chase after him (an idea that John Gray wholeheartedly endorses in the Mars/Venus books). Give what you get. I recommend skimming this one, though. You’ll get too angry if you read it too closely.

12.01.08

Is Online Dating a Good Way to Meet the Right Person? | 100E, 20D Poll

Posted in dating, online dating, poll at 7:27 pm by N

Online dating has its supporters and its detractors. Which side of the fence are you on? Share your stories in the comments.

Inspired by these NPR stories (thanks for listening to All Things Considered on the evening commute, V.!):

The Goodness of Fit

Posted in dating, me at 7:45 am by N

My therapist and I finally got on the subject of relationships last week. “Are you dating anyone?” he asked. He talked about how he often does premarital counseling for people who are “programmed daters” — the type of people who are so on the graduate, get a job, date, get married, have 2.5 kids, etc. track that they’re not even thinking about it anymore — they’re just programmed to do it. When I asked him how he helps those people, he said he asks them to lean in, then bangs their heads together, and says, “WAKE UP!” (Metaphorically speaking, of course.) His job is to basically get them to think about what they’re doing and why they’re doing it. That way, when they get married, they at least understand why — and who they’re actually marrying.

He said that I seem to be the type who does what I want to do and then looks for someone to fit into that, to complement what I already have in my life. It’s what I try to do. My friend T. was watching football with a friend of his who recently broke up with his girlfriend. “I could never do this when we were together,” the friend said. I can’t relate to that girl at all. When C.C. and I were dating, it drove me nuts that he didn’t go out more with his friends, partially because I felt somewhat guilty flitting about from practice to gig to drinks to dinner to whatever and coming home and finding him at his computer. Every. Single. Time.

It seems to me there are two main types of fits: lifestyle and emotional. L. recently moved her last belongings out of the apartment she shared with her now ex-husband. Seeing what he’d done with the place since she’d left brought on a long-delayed grief. “I love his lifestyle,” she said. “We were so compatible in that way.” That’s why they were together — happily — for 10 years. But they were incompatible emotionally, and that’s why they split up.

I’ve made the mistake in the past of confusing lifestyle compatibility with emotional compatibility. D.D. and I were perfectly compatible in many ways: we both played the same type of music, we both sang, we liked movies and going to see bands and drinking in dive bars and hanging out with our friends. And all those things were so fun and easy that it made me think that we were emotionally compatible. But we weren’t.

So now my charge is to find someone who is emotionally compatible with me. And I think that’s what my list of criteria was about — trying to get a clearer idea of who I am and what I need. In Mars and Venus on a Date (seriously, I love that book), John Gray talks about how, in the beginning stages of a relationship, women should think about how they’re feeling to stay focused on making sure the guy can meet their emotional needs, rather than getting caught up in the momentum of a relationship.

My therapist said that he counseled one couple who ended up breaking off their engagement. The guy was going through an awakening and the girl wasn’t. They split up, and it had a huge impact on both their lives, causing them to grow and change in ways they wouldn’t have if they were still together. They eventually tried dating again, and three years later, they got married. My therapist performed the ceremony. I love that story.